Monday 2 november 2009
1
02
/11
/Nov
/2009
13:15
Hello Blue Eagle,
In today's society, certain things are still not completely accepted, like for instance homosexuality. I would like to ask what you think about homosexuality.
Laurent
That's a complex and difficult question.
Let’s start with the Native American tradition which, I think, has a very healthy attitude towards homosexuality. I met men who felt very comfortable with their
sexual orientation, since what they were had been accepted very early. Indeed, the grandmothers, who knew how to identify the specific characteristics of those young children (before they were
3), knew how to honor the two-spirits. They are called “two-spirits”, because they possess those two dispositions in them, the masculine and the feminine. This corroborates studies which state
that in some cases homosexuality is in fact a genetical condition.
I realize something is disturbing me while I write on this topic. It has to do with the words “homosexuality” and “sexual orientation”. In fact, this is barely
related to sexuality, and totally related to life. I notice how obsessed with sexuality our civilization is, and this has in fact distorted the true essence of the love-based encounter which
creates life, to turn it into a short-lived and fleeting pleasure which in reality leaves one unsatisfied and empty. This focus on the sexual act, as well as the innumerable taboos and
perversions related to it, are symptomatic of the confusion in which modern civilization is immersed with regards to its understanding of Man. The more the civilized man will perfect the machines
which invade his life, the more he will lose the understanding of his true nature. In short, I don’t want to speak any more about homosexuals or sexual orientation, but rather about two-spirit
people and a choice of internal polarization.
Native American communities would accept two-spirit people as special beings possessing particular talents (and some families and nations still have this
understanding today). Here are women who possess the strength of a man, and men endowed with a woman’s intuition. Very useful in a context of communitarian lifestyle. As for wedding and the
capacity to create life, the tradition shared by most of nations, namely to accept polygamy, made it possible for all beings to express themselves and contribute to the building of a family life.
A man who preferred to live like a woman could be the second wife of a warrior, thus contributing to the life of this family. The warrior-woman, less frequent, could dress as a man, marry another
woman, but also a man, and not necessarily a two-spirit one. Thus, she could conceive and bring up children, or contribute to the upbringing of her “spouses’” children.
In the remote communitarian life of the First Nations, all were accepted and honored, in so far as they were useful and could perform one of the innumerable roles
needed by the community. Like in any community, to gain the esteem and respect of the other members of the community, one had to prove that he was a true human being. That means to be autonomous
and sovereign, capable of providing for his own needs and those of his family and providing an appreciable contribution to his community and to his own development as a true human
being1 .
Personally, I don’t really have any opinion on this subject. I've met Native Americans who felt perfectly at ease with their identity, and had in fact remarkable
qualities and dispositions, because they were in peace with their internal polarization. I also met men and women with enormous problems, some of them died from Aids, and never found peace.
Although some of them had become friends, and we shared many special moments, and even worked together, they never really succeeded in finding the harmony and peace which could have allowed them
to offer a significant contribution to the society around them. When the possibility to be healed from their afflictions was offered to them (as some Native American shamans can heal certain
illnesses where official medicine remains helpless), they did not accept. Their inner turmoil and feeling of rejection were so deeply incrusted, that in reality, they preferred to die.
I think that all this is in fact a problem related to the understanding of the essential nature of Man. The system which currently manipulates our world, and
presents itself under the appearance of progress, influencing and conditioning educational institutions all over the world, gives no importance to the discovery of the meaning of life. Such
questions as “Who am I?”, to which every human being has to find an answer, are simply ignored in that system, this artificial matrix which conditions the humans and feeds them with medical
drugs, so as to better control him. Thus, the ones who are “different” are cast aside and can develop harmful psychic and physical pathologies, incapable of finding internal peace which could
lead to the understanding of who they truly are.
It is important to respect all beings for what they are. It is essential that every human being can “find himself”, so that he can offer a contribution to the world
in which he lives. This truth is quite simple, but not always understood in today’s civilization.
As is, I strongly feel that I have given an incomplete answer to your question. I don’t think I have understood all that can be understood on this topic. I hope
nonetheless that I have offered some food for thought. I know the distress of those who have not been honored in their internal polarization, and I feel deep compassion for them.
May truth, light and lave give them the peace they deserve.
Blue Eagle
1 For more information
about the definition of a human being, see Le Sentier de la Beauté, by Aigle Bleu, Invocation Publishing. Translation of this book should be available in
2011.
Recent comments